Skip to main content

Why this blog ?

What is this blog about ?

This blog is an outward expression of my inner experiences on a journey upon a path onto which I had consciously decided to walk starting sometime in 2005. After earning a bachelors degree from a local university in engineering I had frustration of not having learnt anything substantial or rather having learnt only superficially. So I made a decision to go into the very depths of everything (today after many years it can be termed as examining the causes underlying the situations rather than just addressing them at the effects level). It was a decision not to accept any body of so called knowledge (therefore I used to keep it only as a working hypotheses) from any source without understanding it (today I consciously recognize that the very faculty that made it possible is termed as intuition and the Knowledge obtained through it is what Sri Aurobindo says as "The Knowledge by Identity") and being convinced after a thorough consideration.

The feeling of having learnt superficially was somewhat placated after studying more intuitively during masters degree. However having gone into the depth of one of the subjects (Signal Processing and Pattern Recognition in Electronics and Communications Engineering) I was still not totally satisfied regarding some of the fundamental questions in the field regarding why certain things are happening the way they are. In fact the answers being proposed by the entire community (IEEE Signal Processing Community) in published papers made me feel intuitively that it was incorrect. However inwardly a small voice inside me was not letting me sit peacefully as there has to be cause and effect beyond randomness of information and signals. Also the urge to get into the cause-effect relationships to satisfy my innate prompting that nothing in the universe can be ultimately random and there needs to have a meaning and cause underlying the outward phenomena made me go into the depths and question everything I could lay my eyes upon. This was how my PhD. started. Meanwhile I was reading all the classic spiritual material I could lay my eyes upon in a scientific questioning manner. After an epic inward struggle to go against the contemporary knowledge and dare to trust my intuition (or that small inner voice which could be heard in silence) I could finally feel the peace of having succeeded against the conventional belief. Of-course the outer confirmation of this came after a year of struggle to get the thesis reviewed and the reviewer confirmed the intuition using three phrases in different lines for the work - timely, truly interdisciplinary, original in a non-incremental fashion.


Naturally the joy and curiosity to further experiment with this small voice (or in other words what is this intuition which didn't err?) and share this inward journey with others so that it may inspire them to find and trust their own inner voice has resulted into this blog.  

Briefly, Trying to seek a deeper meaning of life and universe not provided by todays materialistic education system, I started with a peculiar website called askrealjesus.com by Kim Micheals back in 2007. Since then using "intuition", I read and experimented with many teachings listed in aother post. Through these teachings I was able to solve one of the most fundamental question in Signal processing in my doctoral years. This sparked my curiosity helped resolve my inner crisis through the synthesis of teachings of certain mystics and esotericists such as Blavatsky, Alice Bailey, Dane Rudhyar, Godfre Ray King, Lucille Cedercrans, Sri Aurobindo, Cyril Scott, Micheal D Robbins, Henry T Laurency, Rudolf Steiner, Nicholas and Helena Roerich, Alexander Grothendieck, M Gandhi, Damodar Mavalankar, Brian Weiss, J J Dewey, Vicente Beltran Anglada. This blog is an ongoing journey of synthesis of all above works as a service to those seeking a meaning and solution for the planetary crisis through which humanity is passing into the new age of Aquarius.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More on Synthesis

 Again we shall contemplate on a few more words on the wisdom of synthesis (navigating the "narrow razor-edged Path" between duality or the "noble middle path" of Buddha) from our beloved DK. However I wish to emphasize that Djwal Khul and Alice Bailey demonstrated practical (not just theoretically) synthesis. For instance Alice Bailey being born in the west was open enough to acknowledge and bring forth teachings from a far wiser eastern/oriental master Djwal Khul. She could both surrender herself (a difficult quality to develop for the western concrete mind with its overemphasis on freedom) and at the same time was careful enough to guard herself against foolish blind devotion (a vice of oriental masses). Another disciple who demonstrated practical synthesis was Blavatsky (synthesis of religions). She established Theosophical society headquarters in the west and soon shifted it to the east although she worked and died for the cause of theosophy in the west. One mo

Albert Einstein on Intuition

  Albert Einstein and Rabindranath Tagore In Berlin , Germany - Some selected quotes and thoughts of Albert Einstein on intuition - The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. We will not solve the problems of the world from the same level of thinking we were at when we created them. More than anything else, this new century demands new thinking: We must change our materially based analyses of the world around us to include broader, more multidimensional perspectives.  I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.  The intellect has little to do on the road to discovery. There comes a leap in consciousness, call it Intuition or what you will, the solu

What is a seed-thought ?

 One of my friends questioned me: What is a seed-thought ? This post attempts to throw some light with example, on the concept of a seed-thought. Here is how we define it: "A seed-thought is simply a thought-form or a phrase or symbolic words which conceal a fundamental truth and acts as a seed that sprouts in a contemplative meditation (meditation with a seed) revealing that truth." A Seed-thought being a (thought-)form, we need to look also the broader concept of "form as a symbol", of which a seed-thought is just an example. Earlier we tabulated so many example of trinities. "Purpose - Idea - Form" is one such trinity of symbol. What this means is that every symbol has three interpretations - as a from it is an expression of some underlying idea. This idea has behind it, in its turn, a deeper underlying purpose. These three interpretations of a symbol can be summarized as: 1. Exoteric interpretation:  Based on its objective utility and upon the nature o