Skip to main content

East-West Comparative Philosophy II

 Let us pick up where we left off comparative philosophy (pointing towards a synthetic world philosophy). I have made a table giving a quick comparative analysis (using specific parameters such as epistemology, metaphysics, Life's ideal, man's ultimate nature, civilization and cultures, evolution etc) of the three main philosophical traditions. 


In simple words, if we were to take the three traditions together, we find three overall standpoints of their philosophies: 


1. The inward (Indian) : The most important characteristic is the reflective inwardness and Intuition. Intuition being naturally coexistent and continuous with intellect yet a faculty of wider cognition and working without the distinction. Indian philosophy, particularly the dominant Vedanta and the highest forms of Buddhism, recognized the possibility of mind's witnessing itself (through higher grades or categories of self, the intuitive mind being one of them), through which it can realize the grand conscious unity underlying the universe and extending far beyond it. It termed the grand conscious unity witnessed coining words such as Divine, Absolute, Brahman, Vijiidna, Tathata, Nirvana, and so on.


2. The outward (Western) : In western philosophy also, the Neo-Platonists, the great Christian mystics, and some of the idealistic philosophers recognized some of those deeper truths of inwardness. But if one takes the dominant trends and contemporary achievements into consideration, one finds that its major accomplishment lies in liberating the object, or outwardness, from its involvement with the subject, or inwardness. Of the two directions, the outward has received deeper attention in western philosophy.


3. The middle (Chinese) : The overall impression Chinese philosophy (except Buddhism) gives is that it is neither deeply inward nor extremely outward. It has always tried keeping a balance between the two, and is more comfortable with "Man in society" than with ultimate problems of inwardness or outwardness. Overall no direction is pursued to the extreme; no argument is pressed to its logical conclusions.


Attached: Introductory comparative table of three major philosophical systems – Indian (The inward), Western (The Outward), and Chinese (The Middle), summarized from Book “Introduction to comparative philosophy” by P. T. Raju.













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More on Synthesis

 Again we shall contemplate on a few more words on the wisdom of synthesis (navigating the "narrow razor-edged Path" between duality or the "noble middle path" of Buddha) from our beloved DK. However I wish to emphasize that Djwal Khul and Alice Bailey demonstrated practical (not just theoretically) synthesis. For instance Alice Bailey being born in the west was open enough to acknowledge and bring forth teachings from a far wiser eastern/oriental master Djwal Khul. She could both surrender herself (a difficult quality to develop for the western concrete mind with its overemphasis on freedom) and at the same time was careful enough to guard herself against foolish blind devotion (a vice of oriental masses). Another disciple who demonstrated practical synthesis was Blavatsky (synthesis of religions). She established Theosophical society headquarters in the west and soon shifted it to the east although she worked and died for the cause of theosophy in the west. One mo...

Third Initiation : Disciple and Mental Body

 We studied initiations until the second in our ealier posts. Today let us look at the third especially from the perspective of a disciple (rather than the ray as well as the external ceremonial aspect conferred during the wesak full moon which we will cover later). The third initiation marks the culmination of complete mastery of the mental (in the same way that the earlier two initiations resulted into the control of physical and astral planes). It is a distinct initiation, which marks a definite transition out of the form consciousness (lower personality of mental, emotional(astral) and physical planes), and the initiate can function at will on the plane of the intuition though soul (ego). Between the second and third initiation work is struggling with and mastering the energies of the mental world. What kind of work ? DK sums that for us (details found in TWM book) as -  "A. Work on the mental plane produces realisation of duality. The disciple seeks to blend and merge the...

Aphorisms as seed-thoughts

 Subsequent to our discussion on seed-thoughts, another great example of seed-thouht I think is an aphorism. The complete agni-yoga series of books by Roerichs are aphorisms of Ethical living (and give Ray 1 flavour of fiery will to the yoga of synthesis). Similarly the temple aphorisms of Francia A. La Due give a Ray 5 flavour of occult science to the works of H.P. Blavatsky and William Q. Judge. We quote those aphorims (as seed-thoughts) from temple teachings of Master H. (with his image):  "Days come and days go, but if thou watchest thou shalt see: THE LOAD thou hast laid on the heart of a friend will God transfer to thine own heart; heavy as it presses on the heart of thy friend, heavier will it press on thine own heart in the days to come. THE STONE thou hast cast from the path of the blind will smite the adder lying in wait for thee. THE WEIGHT thou hast clamped on the feet of another will drag thine own feet into Hadean desolation. THE SHELTER thou hast given the wayfa...