East-West Comparative Philosophy II

Let us pick up where we left off comparative philosophy (pointing towards a synthetic world philosophy). I have made a table giving a quick comparative analysis (using specific parameters such as epistemology, metaphysics, Life's ideal, man's ultimate nature, civilization and cultures, evolution etc) of the three main philosophical traditions.

In simple words, if we were to take the three traditions together, we find three overall standpoints of their philosophies:

1. The inward (Indian) : The most important characteristic is the reflective inwardness and Intuition. Intuition being naturally coexistent and continuous with intellect yet a faculty of wider cognition and working without the distinction. Indian philosophy, particularly the dominant Vedanta and the highest forms of Buddhism, recognized the possibility of mind's witnessing itself (through higher grades or categories of self, the intuitive mind being one of them), through which it can realize the grand conscious unity underlying the universe and extending far beyond it. It termed the grand conscious unity witnessed coining words such as Divine, Absolute, Brahman, Vijiidna, Tathata, Nirvana, and so on.

2. The outward (Western) : In western philosophy also, the Neo-Platonists, the great Christian mystics, and some of the idealistic philosophers recognized some of those deeper truths of inwardness. But if one takes the dominant trends and contemporary achievements into consideration, one finds that its major accomplishment lies in liberating the object, or outwardness, from its involvement with the subject, or inwardness. Of the two directions, the outward has received deeper attention in western philosophy.

3. The middle (Chinese) : The overall impression Chinese philosophy (except Buddhism) gives is that it is neither deeply inward nor extremely outward. It has always tried keeping a balance between the two, and is more comfortable with "Man in society" than with ultimate problems of inwardness or outwardness. Overall no direction is pursued to the extreme; no argument is pressed to its logical conclusions.

Attached: Introductory comparative table of three major philosophical systems – Indian (The inward), Western (The Outward), and Chinese (The Middle), summarized from Book “Introduction to comparative philosophy” by P. T. Raju.

Comments

Albert Einstein on Intuition

Albert Einstein and Rabindranath Tagore In Berlin , Germany - Some selected quotes and thoughts of Albert Einstein on intuition - The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. We will not solve the problems of the world from the same level of thinking we were at when we created them. More than anything else, this new century demands new thinking: We must change our materially based analyses of the world around us to include broader, more multidimensional perspectives. I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research. The intellect has little to do on the road to discovery. There comes a leap in consciousness, call it Intuition or what you will, the solu

More on Synthesis

Again we shall contemplate on a few more words on the wisdom of synthesis (navigating the "narrow razor-edged Path" between duality or the "noble middle path" of Buddha) from our beloved DK. However I wish to emphasize that Djwal Khul and Alice Bailey demonstrated practical (not just theoretically) synthesis. For instance Alice Bailey being born in the west was open enough to acknowledge and bring forth teachings from a far wiser eastern/oriental master Djwal Khul. She could both surrender herself (a difficult quality to develop for the western concrete mind with its overemphasis on freedom) and at the same time was careful enough to guard herself against foolish blind devotion (a vice of oriental masses). Another disciple who demonstrated practical synthesis was Blavatsky (synthesis of religions). She established Theosophical society headquarters in the west and soon shifted it to the east although she worked and died for the cause of theosophy in the west. One mo

What is a seed-thought ?

One of my friends questioned me: What is a seed-thought ? This post attempts to throw some light with example, on the concept of a seed-thought. Here is how we define it: "A seed-thought is simply a thought-form or a phrase or symbolic words which conceal a fundamental truth and acts as a seed that sprouts in a contemplative meditation (meditation with a seed) revealing that truth." A Seed-thought being a (thought-)form, we need to look also the broader concept of "form as a symbol", of which a seed-thought is just an example. Earlier we tabulated so many example of trinities. "Purpose - Idea - Form" is one such trinity of symbol. What this means is that every symbol has three interpretations - as a from it is an expression of some underlying idea. This idea has behind it, in its turn, a deeper underlying purpose. These three interpretations of a symbol can be summarized as: 1. Exoteric interpretation: Based on its objective utility and upon the nature o

Yoga of Synthesis: At the gateway of new Civilisation, Culture and Ideals of the Aquarian Age

Search This Blog