Skip to main content

Savitri Book 1, Canto 2: Savitri, Who Leads

 Page 17, Savitri (A Legend, Symbol, the Mantric Epic of Sri Aurobindo):


For this she had accepted mortal breath;

To wrestle with the Shadow she had come

And must confront the riddle of man’s birth

And life’s brief struggle in dumb Matter’s night.

Whether to bear with Ignorance and death

Or hew the ways of Immortality,

To win or lose the godlike game for man,

Was her soul’s issue thrown with Destiny’s dice.

But not to submit and suffer was she born;

To lead, to deliver was her glorious part.

- (Book 1 Canto 2 Painting No. 9)


Savitri is a missioned child. She has accepted a mortal birth in order to awaken Satyavan from his fallen state in soul-less materialism. To battle against his Doom she has accepted to become human. On the three lower planes of the terrestrial world she must face the mystery of man's birth and his struggle in the darkness of unconscious Matter. This is the central issue, as the very title of this canto, 'The issue' denotes. It is a choice she has to make - Either she has to axe a way out from the thick jungle of death into immortality or bear the ignorance and death of this world. She has to conquer death and show the way for humans to follow. It is a godlike game where her soul's destiny will be decided by a throw of the dice. Even worse, the game is not for her own sake but for the sake of the whole human race. Yet her very nature is that of a leader and ultimately a Saviour who refuses to suffer and surrender but gloriously fights till the very end sacrificing everything in that work. 



From Symbol to concrete real world examples: Does that not remind us of 'The Mother' who took up the whole project of 'Auroville' at the very end of her lifetime or H. P. Blavatsky who refused to give up before completing her magnum opus "The Secret Doctrine" on her deathbed ? To quote regarding the battle of one of a theosophical pioneer to assist in Savitri's work of theosophical movement (from adyar archives and the book on Damodar by Sven Eek): 


"In December 1884 a committee was formed at Adyar for receiving letters and teachings from the masters, but it collapsed before any teachings were transmitted. KH explained why:


The secret Committee ... was ready, when a few Europeans ... took upon themselves the authority of reversing the decision of the whole Council. They declined (though the reason they gave was another one) – to receive our instructions through Subba Row and Damodar, the latter of whom is hated by Messrs. L. Fox and Hartmann.


Hartmann later described Damodar as a ‘mental pigmy’ who ‘imagined himself to be the mouth-piece of an invisible power’. He believed that Damodar had sometimes imitated KH’s writing to give his own views greater authority. It appears that during the Coulomb crisis Damodar did in fact precipitate a very important ‘KH letter’ without KH’s consent.


Damodar’s health was seriously affected by all the troubles at headquarters and by overwork. He began to cough blood, a recurrence of his previously arrested tuberculosis. He obtained permission to go to his master’s ashram in Tibet, and left Adyar with Blavatsky’s blessing on 23 February 1885. According to Blavatsky, ‘Damodar was ready from his last birth to enter the highest PATH and suspected it. He had long been waiting for the expected permission to go to Tibet before the expiration of the 7 years [of probation] ...’ When he came to bid her farewell, he told her: ‘I go for your sake. If the Maha Chohan is satisfied with my services and devotion, He may permit me to vindicate you, by proving the Masters do exist.’ Blavatsky herself was in poor health at this time, and left India a month later, never to return."


Image: "She who leads" by Nicholas Roerich 1943 in public domain, painting of a Savitri (Helena Roerich).



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aphorisms as seed-thoughts

 Subsequent to our discussion on seed-thoughts, another great example of seed-thouht I think is an aphorism. The complete agni-yoga series of books by Roerichs are aphorisms of Ethical living (and give Ray 1 flavour of fiery will to the yoga of synthesis). Similarly the temple aphorisms of Francia A. La Due give a Ray 5 flavour of occult science to the works of H.P. Blavatsky and William Q. Judge. We quote those aphorims (as seed-thoughts) from temple teachings of Master H. (with his image):  "Days come and days go, but if thou watchest thou shalt see: THE LOAD thou hast laid on the heart of a friend will God transfer to thine own heart; heavy as it presses on the heart of thy friend, heavier will it press on thine own heart in the days to come. THE STONE thou hast cast from the path of the blind will smite the adder lying in wait for thee. THE WEIGHT thou hast clamped on the feet of another will drag thine own feet into Hadean desolation. THE SHELTER thou hast given the wayfa...

Esoteric astrology & psychology of Alexander Grothendieck part 1

A disciple from the inner ashram of Hilarion (Ray 5) I am trying to discern here energetic (seven rays) pattern in Grothendieck's esoterically challenging life through perspectives offered by Esoteric Astrology, Psychology and the Science of Seven Rays. The exoteric life details of this great disciple can be found on Grothendieck Circle Website, which will be the reference for the exoteric facts of this post. 1. Grothendieck (born in Germany) remained stateless throughout his life but choose to settle in a country (France) whose Soul Ray is fifth and Personality ray is Third reflecting his estimated ray profile through my research. 2. I hypothesize that Grothendieck subconsciously responded to energies from the Avatar of Synthesis by influencing the work of Saunders Maclane giving rise to a foundational branch (although he didn't give first definition of a category) of Mathematics called Category theory which is precisely the synthesis of entire mathematics (not yet fully ackno...

The Yoga of Synthesis Diary Leaves 4

 Album The Yoga of Synthesis  Dated 22 January 2025 The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali give us four stages of meditation and when applied on symbols we find: 1. First, as the form is pondered upon, the realisation begins to dawn that it is but a symbol of an inner reality. 2. Second, there is a recognition of the quality or nature of the form—its subjective energy, the quality of the force that seems to flow through it, the emotion that the symbol arouses. 3. Third, as we concentrate on considering the quality, we arrive next at the purpose, the motive, and the idea that the symbol has held concealed. 4. Fourth, in the final stage of identification, one becomes at one with the symbol; one shares its quality; one participates in its purpose, and through these stages one arrives at a unity with the creator of the form. When applied to the four symbols (of Helena Blavatsky, Sri Aurobindo and The Mother, Alice Bailey, and the category-theoretic model of Cause-Meaning/Quality-Effect), we...